Patel & Almeida - Trademark Attorneys
Call Us: 800-973-7114

Top-Rated Trademark Attorneys
  Connect With Us
FaceBookTwitterGoogle Plus
  Home: Trademark Litigation

Trademark Litigation

When your business is at risk due to a trademark dispute, our firm is prepared to aggressively protect your trademark rights. We have extensive experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants in U.S. federal courts and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). We also recognize that litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and we try to resolve disputes whenever possible—for example, by a co-existence agreement, license agreement, or purchase of trademark rights, when appropriate.


One can oppose another's trademark application to prevent the mark from registering. An opposition can be based on a number of grounds, including prior use of the trademark before the applicant. Commencing an opposition involves filing a complaint at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The Applicant must file an "answer" or default and lose the application. After the complaint and answer are filed, the parties conduct "discovery"—the formal exchange of information and documents to be used as evidence at trial. After trial, the case is decided by a panel of three trademark judges. Opposition proceedings can be time consuming and costly to litigate, although the vast majority of oppositions result in a default judgment (applicant does not respond to the complaint) or a settlement agreement before trial.


Similar to an opposition, a registered trademark can be cancelled on a number of grounds, such as prior use of the mark by the complainant or non-use (abandonment) of the mark by the registrant. The procedures are very similar to an opposition. Likewise, most cases terminate in a default judgment or settlement agreement.

Trademark Infringement Actions in Federal Court

In the most serious disputes, one party may commence a lawsuit in a U.S. federal court seeking monetary damages and/or an "injunction" prohibiting the other party from using a similar mark. The procedures are similar to oppositions and cancellations, but federal court litigation is more costly and time consuming. Often, the stakes are high in federal court litigation, as the defendant could be found liable for money damages and may be ordered to cease using the disputed mark. Often, the costs of litigation are higher than the amount of money in dispute, which may encourage settlement. As a result, the vast majority of cases settle before trial, resulting in a co-existence, license agreement, or purchase of the trademark. Hiring an experienced, aggressive litigator is critical to obtaining a favorable settlement or victory on the merits in federal court.

Our trial lawyers have an impressive track record of litigation victories and favorable settlements in both federal courts and at the TTAB, including many published decisions.

We have handled over 200 federal court cases and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings (oppositions, cancellations, ex parte appeals).

Sample of Our Litigation Victories in Federal Court:
Curtis v. Shinsachi Pharmaceuticals, U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 2:14-cv-00591 Successfully obtained a monetary judgment including recovery of attorney's fees, cancellation of three federal registered trademarks, transfer of three domain names, and injunctive relief. Read Decison
Pearson Facial Plastic Surgery, P.A. v. J.M. Pearson, M.D., Inc., U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 2:13-cv-13-03440-SJO Successfully obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a trademark infringement matter.
Ryan Kang v. Bleu Coffee, U.S. Federal District Court Case No. 2:14-cv-03528-RSWL-PJW. Obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a copyright infringement matter.
Zoomania Games v Adictiz, S.A.S., U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 1:14-CV-3768. Obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a trademark infringement matter.


Sample of Our Litigation Victories at the TTAB
(Oppositions / Cancellations / Ex Parte Appeals)
Red Bull vs. Andale Energy TTAB Opposition No. 91210860 Successfully dismissed opposition on the grounds that the marks at issue were simply too dissimlar to cause a likelihood of confusion. Read More
Delta Air Lines, Inc. vs. Delta Van Lines, Inc. TTAB Opposition No. 91168554 Successfully defended our client's mark against an opposition filed by Delta Air Lines. Read More
Exxon Mobil Corporation vs. Jaya Medical Supplies, Inc., TTAB Opposition No. 91185716 Successfully defended our client's mark against an opposition filed by Exxon Mobile Corporation.
Choice First Distribution, LLC v. John L. Brown TTAB Opposition No. 92044116, Successfully cancelled the trademark CHRONIC 187 with a showing that the registration was void ab initio due to the registrant’s mere token use of its trademark. Read More

    Request a Consultation

Trademark Insider Award
Top Rated U.S. Firm
We are one of the nation's top filers and have been rated by Trademark Insider® to be among the top 25 U.S. law firms.

Since 1999
For over 15 years, Patel & Almeida has been the trusted leader in protecting the intellectual property of our clients.

International Trademark Association
BBB Logo

Domain Disputes
California Registered Agent

Learn More
Trademark Basics
Copyright Basics
Patent Basics
Patent FAQ's

Our Team

  Connect With Us:
  FaceBookTwitterGoogle Plus

  Copyright 1999 - 2015 Patel & Almeida, P.C. All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy | Legal | Disclaimer | Site Map