Patel & Almeida - Trademark Attorneys
 
FAQ'S
BLOG
CONTACT
 
Call Us: 800-973-7114

Top-Rated Trademark Attorneys
  Connect With Us
FaceBookTwitterGoogle Plus
 
 
 
 
Trademark Attorneys
 


Patel & Almeida serves clients in the areas of trademark and copyright law, delivering quality legal services at a fraction of the cost encountered at larger national firms. Our clients value our sound judgment, round-the-clock responsiveness, and our ability to find creative solutions to complex problems in a cost-efficient manner.

Whether you're filing a new trademark application in the United States or internationally, responding to a USPTO office action, or caught in a trademark dispute requiring the finesse of an expert litigator, our attorneys and staff are always prepared to deliver exceptional results. With 15 years of legal experience, and as one of the nation's top-rated intellectual property law firms, our record speaks for itself.

 
Our Recent Trademark Registrations:

Trademark: Harlyn Reg. No. 4772752 Registration Date: July 14, 2015

Trademark: En Creme Reg. No. 4772751 Registration Date: July 14, 2015

Trademark: Loverse Reg. No. 4773909 Registration Date: July 14, 2015
 


 
Sample of Our Litigation Victories:
Curtis v. Shinsachi Pharmaceuticals, U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 2:14-cv-00591 Successfully obtained a monetary judgement including recovery of attorneys fees, cancellation of three federal registered trademarks, transfer of three domain names, and injunctive reilef. Read Decison
Pearson Facial Plastic Surgery, P.A. v. J.M. Pearson, M.D., Inc., U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 2:13-cv-13-03440-SJO Sucessfully obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a trademark infringement matter.
Ryan Kang v. Bleu Coffee, U.S. Federal District Court Case No. 2:14-cv-03528-RSWL-PJW. Obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a copyright infringement matter.
Zoomania Games v Adictiz, S.A.S., U.S. Federal District Court, Case No. 1:14-CV-3768. Obtained a favorable settlement for our client in a trademark infringement matter.
Red Bull vs. Andale Energy TTAB Opposition No. 91210860 Successfully dismissed opposition on the grounds that the marks at issue were simply too dissimlar to cause a likelihood of confusion. Read More
Delta Air Lines, Inc. vs. Delta Van Lines, Inc. TTAB Opposition No. 91168554 Successfully defended our client's mark against an opposition filed by Delta Air Lines. Read More
Exxon Mobil Corporation vs. Jaya Medical Supplies, Inc., TTAB Opposition No. 91185716 Successfully defended our client's mark against an opposition filed by Exxon Mobile Corporation.
Choice First Distribution, LLC v. John L. Brown TTAB Opposition No. 92044116, Successfully cancelled the trademark CHRONIC 187 with a showing that the registration was void ab initio due to the registrant’s mere token use of its trademark. Read More
 

 

 
Sample of Our Office Action Victories:
Successfully argued that no likelihood of confusion exists between ELECTBENEFITS, Ser. No. 86351419, and SELECTBENEFIT Reg. No. 1722413 both for financial services. Read More
Argued that no likelihood of confusion exists between FILTER PRO Ser. No. 86170150 for air and liquid filters for industrial installations, and FILTER PRO Reg. No. 2509352 for oil filters, air filters, and fuel filters. Read More
Argued sucessfully that no likelihood of confusion exists between EXCELLANCE Ser. No. 79138280 for perfumes and cosmetics, and EXCELLENCE Reg. No. 1116798 for hair coloring preparations owned by L'Oreal and between EXCELLENCE Reg. No. 3553048 for colognes, perfumes and cosmetics. Read More
Successfully argued that no likelihood of confusion exists between SPYRAL, Ser. No. 85479842, for "live performances by a musical band" and SPYRALI, Reg. No. 3627046, for "organization of exhibitions for cultural or entertainment purposes." Read More
Successfully argued that the mark XLBRAKE, Ser. No. 85351126 is not "merely descriptive" for "extra-large" sized auto brakes because "XL" refers to "acceleration", not the size of the brakes; and because auto brakes are not normally sold in "extra-large" size. Read More
 

 


 

Trademark Insider Award
Top Rated U.S. Firm
We are one of the nation's top filers and have been rated by Trademark InsiderĀ® to be among the top 25 U.S. law firms.

Since 1999
For over 15 years, Patel & Almeida has been the trusted leader in protecting the intellectual property of our clients.

Free Consultation
Call us at 818-380-1900
our use our online form to receive a free consultation.
Request Consultation




Services
Trademarks
Federal Litigation
Domain Disputes
Copyrights
California Registered Agent

Learn More
Trademark Basics
Copyright Basics
Patent Basics
Patent FAQ's

Support
Contact
Our Team


  Connect With Us:
  FaceBookTwitterGoogle Plus
 



Verisign
  Copyright 1999 - 2015 Patel & Almeida, P.C. All Rights Reserved

Privacy Policy | Legal | Disclaimer | Site Map